Paying Twice for a Supplier’s Default: Why Section 16(2)(c) Can No Longer Be Applied by Rote
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in Shaurya Alloys upholds the provision but disciplines the way it is used
Read insightKNOWLEDGE CENTREInsights that move
Insights that move
business forward.
Practical perspectives on tax, audit, compliance, finance and business decisions from the DMRN team.
Wrong GST Head? Adjust, Don’t Demand Again
GST paid under the wrong head must be adjusted—not demanded again with interest and penalty, the Karnataka High Court held.
Read insight
DOWNLOADING A NOTICE IS NOT THE SAME AS VALID SERVICE UNDER GST LAW
Punjab & Haryana High Court holds that merely uploading a notice or order on the GST Portal does not constitute valid service under Section 169 of the CGST Act.
Read insight
DMRN- Section 16(2)(c) Constitutional Validity
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS SECTION 16(2)(c) OF THE CGST ACT: ITC REMAINS CONDITIONAL ON THE SUPPLIER'S ACTUAL PAYMENT OF TAX
Read insight
DMRN-GST INSIGHTS
Can a genuine recipient lose Input Tax Credit because a supplier's GST registration is cancelled years after the transaction?
Read insight